“If that you were maybe not already engaged after the violation occurred, each and every rapist comprise required to wed friends, without likelihood of breakup.” –Rachel Held Evans, writer of one year of Biblical Womanhood
“The laws [in Deut 22:23-29] do not the truth is forbid violation; the two institutionalize they…” –Harold Arizona, St. Paul class of Theology
“Your unprejudiced divinely inspired scripture is loaded with sanctioned rape.” –Official Twitter and youtube accounts of Church of Satan.
It’s a constant accusation about Scripture’s treatments for females.
But is it surely what the scripture says?
As with any biblical law, Deuteronomy 22:28-29 demonstrates God’s dynamics; when we finally start to see the purpose of legislation, we come across the heart with the Lawgiver. This legislation defines how community of Israel responded as soon as an unbetrothed pure would be violated through premarital sexual activities. 
The verb regularly make clear how it happened for the woman is ??????? (tapas). Tapas methods to “lay keep [of],”  or “wield.”  Like ????? (?azaq, the phrase for “force) made use of in vv. 25-27, tapas could be translated as “seize.”  Unlike ?azaq, however, tapas will not have alike connotation of energy. Together Hebrew scholar points out, tapas doesn't, in and of it self, infer attack; it is meaning she is “held,” not always “attacked.’ 
There’s a delicate difference between these types of verbs, it produces a big difference. Tapas is frequently accustomed identify a capture.  Tapas furthermore looks in Genesis 39:12; once Potiphar’s wife tried to seduce Joseph, she seized (tapas) him to wear down their correct. It is distinct from ?azaq, which talks of a forcible overwhelming. Daniel neighborhood records that, unlike regulations in passages 25-27, this law offers neither a cry for assist, nor a merchant account of male violence.  It’s most likely your woman in verses 28-29 experienced frustrating salesmanship, perhaps an erosion of the girl correct, but not fundamentally a sexual strike.